Deep Sea Mining: Technological Feasibility vs. Environmental Morality

Deep sea mining is rapidly becoming technologically feasible, but it poses profound and potentially irreversible risks to fragile deep ocean ecosystems, climate regulation, and undiscovered biodiversity. While proponents argue it could supply critical minerals for the energy transition, scientific consensus warns that the environmental and ethical costs far outweigh current benefits, especially given uncertain long-term impacts and weak governance. A precautionary global moratorium, stronger regulations, and prioritizing recycling and alternative technologies are necessary before proceeding with any large-scale exploitation of the deep sea.

Indonesian Nickel: Economy vs Environment

Currently the world’s largest nickel producer, Indonesia plans to expand mining further to meet the demand for clean energy technologies Nickel extraction has negative environmental and social impacts, resulting in deforestation, water pollution, biodiversity loss, illness, and other concerns The national ambitions of critical material production, overlooking its costs, reveal a gap between industrial goals and the material reality of Indonesia

Indonesian Nickel: What Is Its Role In The Just Transition?

Indonesia's nickel industry is made possible by foreign investment, with extraction fueling global clean tech supply chains, while local communities bear the environmental and social consequences Fair trade advocates in the Global North imagine a technology transfer and ethical downstreaming investment, but essentially a systemic shift in transportation models and a reduction of mineral consumption is necessary for climate action For long term resilience in terms of both the environment and global trade, Indonesia has the opportunity to invest in public welfare, green education for workers, and economic diversification beyond nickel